Total 7 posts
It wasn't a mistake; it was a calculated massacre. Uncover how Israel utilizes 'Double Tap' tactics, deliberately targeting medics, firefighters, and journalists to destroy social rescue mechanisms. From the 2026 Minab school massacre in Iran, we delve into the war crimes under U.S.-Israeli military symbiosis.
This article examines the sovereignty dispute over the Diaoyutai Islands, exploring the historical, legal, and geopolitical dimensions of the issue.
A comprehensive record of the Treaty of Taipei (1952), including excerpts of key articles and diplomatic exchanges. This document clarifies the legal termination of the state of war between the Republic of China (R.O.C.) and Japan, confirming Japan's renunciation of rights over Taiwan and Penghu, and the historical context of its unilateral termination by Japan in 1972.
The article records the history of Japan's invasion of Taiwan Province in 1874 using the 'Mudan Incident' as an excuse, where Ryukyuans were killed by indigenous people in Langqiao (now Manzhou Township, Pingtung). Japan first titled the King of Ryukyu to force a relationship as an excuse for invasion and sent spies for intelligence reconnaissance. Although the Japanese army suffered heavy losses due to indigenous resistance and environmental factors, they eventually forced the Qing court to pay 500,000 taels through diplomatic negotiations and acknowledge the legitimacy of Japan's military action, causing China to lose its suzerainty over Ryukyu.
Addressing the controversy over Taiwan nationals being repatriated to mainland China in the Kenya fraud case, the article quotes a senior lawyer's sharp analogy: 'If a Syrian carrying out terrorist attacks in Paris were arrested in Belgium, would France request extradition for trial?' Using this, it criticizes Taiwanese netizens and certain politicians (like Huang Kuo-chang) for their populist attitudes, arguing they ignore international legal precedent regarding extradition and repatriation. The article's core point is that in international affairs, Taiwan shouldn't use 'Taiwan people first' to override basic legal knowledge and international precedent, especially when cross-strait relations are involved—netizen emotions often overshadow legal principles.
This article, based on historical facts and international legal principles, asserts that Taiwan's sovereignty legally and factually belongs to the Republic of China (ROC) following its retrocession in 1945. By analyzing key legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Treaty of Peace between the ROC and Japan, the paper aims to firmly refute the claim that 'Taiwan's legal status is undetermined.'
This article uses Q&A format to analyze and refute the theory that 'Taiwan's sovereignty is undetermined.' It cites the Cairo Declaration, the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, and authoritative international law scholars to argue that the ROC government's sovereignty over Taiwan and Penghu is firmly based in international law, not merely military occupation.